OCCURRENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF
ARSENIC AND URANIUM IN THE POMPERAUG RIVER BASIN AQUIFER,
Craig J. Brown1,* and Robert A. Zielinski2 1) U.S. Geological Survey, 2) The transport of anthropogenic and natural contaminants to public-supply wells (PSWs) is being studied in a glacial aquifer system in the Pomperaug River Basin of west-central Connecticut by the U.S. Geological Survey, as part of the National Water Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program. One of the primary objectives of the study is to identify the source, distribution, and mobility of arsenic, uranium, and other trace elements of concern that could affect the quality of water in PSWs. A 22-well network of monitoring wells was installed and sampled along with the PSW in the modeled part of the aquifer that contributes ground water to the PSW. Trace elements were analyzed in grain coatings extracted from drill-core samples, and fission-track maps were produced from epoxy-mount thin sections of these samples to determine uranium distribution. Ground-water chemistry and solid-phase chemistry are used to determine the critical controls on trace-element concentrations in the water. Stratified glacial deposits
extend over an area of about 13 mi 2 in the Dissolved (filtered) arsenic concentrations in the wells ranged from below the minimum reporting level (MRL) of 0.2 µg/L, to 5.8 µg/L; only five samples were above the MRL. The five samples with the highest dissolved arsenic concentrations had dissolved oxygen levels below 0.8 mg/L, and the two samples with the highest arsenic concentrations had very high dissolved iron levels (above 5 mg/L), indicating arsenic mobility under relatively anoxic conditions. A likely scenario is that sorbed arsenic is mobilized as the ferric oxyhydroxides dissolve under reducing conditions. The dissolved arsenic also may be higher in sediments that are derived from the underlying shales of the Newark Supergroup; both the Shuttle Meadow Formation and the East Berlin Formation can be sulfidic, and sulfides can sequester arsenic. The concentration of arsenic in the PSW was below the MRL. Dissolved (filtered) uranium concentrations in the study area were low, ranging from below the MRL (0.2 mg/L) to 1.3 µg/L; only three samples were above the MRL. Uranium was highest in wells with low dissolved oxygen (<0.8 mg/L) despite the fact that uranium is more soluble under oxic conditions; this indicates that other factors are likely to control uranium concentration than solely dissolved oxygen. Uranium was highest in bedrock wells and generally highest in the deepest well of each cluster, indicating that the proximity to source material (bedrock) affects the dissolved uranium concentration. The concentration of uranium in the PSW was <0.2 µg/L. Activities of Ra-226 and Ra-228 were low (from <0.16 to 0.42 pCi/L and from <0.45 to 0.95 pCi/L, respectively) and are consistent with the uranium concentration data. Ferric oxyhydroxide
coatings on grains of glacial sediments, which can act as sites for sorption
of arsenic or uranium, were extracted using acid solutions and analyzed for
major and trace elements. Ferric-oxyhydroxide
coatings extracted using 10 percent nitric acid yielded iron concentrations
ranging from 2,100 to 2,300 mg/kg (mg of Fe per kg of bulk sediment). The
extracted material also contained 0.09 to 0.38 mg/kg of uranium and 0.07 to
0.12 mg/kg of arsenic. Fission-track radiography of the stratified glacial
deposits shows evidence of uranium associated with ferric oxyhydroxide
grain coatings. Secondary iron oxides occur as oxidized parts of primary iron
oxides, as hematite coatings and stains on other minerals, as a hematite-rich
matrix of rock fragment grains, and as fracture-fill material. The
distribution of uranium in the aquifer material infers the co-occurrence of
uranium progeny such as radium, assuming that the sorbed
uranium is not so recent that there is a limited build up of daughters by
radioactive decay. Radon-222, which is derived from the decay of Ra-226, had
activities in the glacial aquifer of the Despite the low concentrations of dissolved arsenic and uranium in the Pomperaug study area, it is important to understand the mechanisms related to their mobilization and transport. A similar terrane with slightly different conditions (pH, redox chemistry, source material) could result in very different behavior of natural contaminants and concentrations in PSWs. Sorption batch experiments will be performed on core samples from the study area to determine the effects of changes in pH on the sorption or desorption of arsenic and uranium. |